Amusement Park Feasibility Study
Leisure Business Advisors (LBA) specializes in conducting the
feasibility study for a variety of leisure businesses, including
amusement parks. An independent industry expert usually prepares
this detailed study, which is required by potential lenders and
investors.
The feasibility study is the first step of the development process
and provides critical guidance for design, construction, and
operations. It evaluates potential market support and forecasts
usage. It determines potential financial performance and maximum
warranted development costs. It provides detailed physical
planning parameters. It recommends the attraction mix and includes
images for use in initial presentations.
The following paragraphs outline the major tasks typically
involved in conducting a feasibility study.
Task 1: Orientation Meeting
An initial meeting would be held to discuss the project in more
detail and to see the prospective site if one has been chosen.
Task 2: Site and Area Evaluation
The site and local area would be evaluated to determine its
effect on potential usage. Factors include:
- Market proximity
- Physical limitations or constraints
- Access routes
- Traffic patterns
- Surrounding development
- Potential complementary and competitive
facilities
Task 3: Concept Description and Industry Trends
The amusement park concept would be described and industry trends
discussed. Readers of the feasibility study may be unfamiliar with
the concept and this section of the report provides an
introduction before specific project-related issues are examined.
Task 4: Market Analysis
The market areas would be defined based on distance from the
site. Demographic characteristics for the resident market would be
analyzed to provide an indication of support. This would typically
include:
- Population growth
- Age distribution
- Income distribution
The tourist market would be defined and analyzed. Based on
available information, this analysis would likely examine:
- Current size
- Historic growth
- Other characteristics
Task 5: Evaluation of Comparable Facilities
Selected comparable amusement parks would be examined. Available
reported information would be provided on individual
characteristics, including:
- Name and location
- Physical description
- Financial performance
- Development costs
Task 6: Annual Usage
Potential annual usage for the proposed amusement park would be
estimated for the first five years of operation based on a number
of factors, including:
- Planned components
- Size of the available markets
- Qualitative market characteristics
- Market performance achieved by comparable
facilities
- Location and potential competition
Task 7: Physical Planning and Concept Development
LBA would make physical planning recommendations needed to
service expected market demand. The specific parameters vary from
one amusement park to another. Physical planning parameters may
include:
- Recommended types of activities
- Recommended mix and sizing
- Recommended visitor service space
- Minimum land area or building space needed
Initial conceptual efforts may also be provided. These could
include:
- Functional layout diagram for the new
leisure attraction
- Narrative description of a typical visit
from the perspective of a typical family
- 3D computer graphics visualizations of
selected activities
The final report could also include a video presenting the
results of the feasibility study with a "fly-through" or "walk
through" computer animation of part of the new amusement park.
Task 8: Financial Analysis
The financial analysis for the proposed amusement park would be
based on the selected concept and potential usage. Financial
estimates for the first five years of operations would include:
- Revenues by category
- Operating expenses
- Operating profit or surplus
- Return-on-investment for equity investors,
if applicable
Task 9: Warranted and Typical Development Cost
LBA would determine the warranted development cost or investment
based on potential profitability. This is the recommended maximum
amount that should be spent to effectively develop the project and
return a reasonable return-on-investment to equity investors. This
warranted amount would be compared to the actual development costs
for other comparable facilities. Relative size would be taken into
consideration. This comparison would provide guidance as to
whether the proposed amusement park could be developed for its
warranted investment. If it can be, the project is considered
financially feasible.